.png)
A Diagnostic Framework for Staged AI Adoption in Batik Motif Recognition: Integrating CNN Evidence and Implementation Readiness
Abstract
This study proposes a diagnostic dual-layer decision-support framework for staged artificial intelligence adoption in batik motif recognition. The objective is to examine whether technical evidence from convolutional neural network classification and perceived implementation-side readiness can be jointly interpreted to prevent premature deployment in cultural-heritage recognition. The contribution of the study is not a new classifier architecture, but an operational diagnostic logic that treats model performance, class-level instability, readiness perception, governance, security, and feedback mechanisms as complementary but non-substitutable evidence. Methodologically, the technical layer evaluated three transfer-learning baselines, namely VGGNet-16, ResNet50, and MobileNetV2, using 983 batik images across 20 motif classes. The implementation layer assessed perceived readiness among 173 information technology practitioners using the Technology-Organization-Environment-Human plus Feedback dimensions. The integration layer then mapped technical-readiness evidence and readiness perception into explicit staged-adoption decisions rather than averaging them as interchangeable indicators. The analysis used performance summaries, readiness profiles, decision matrices, security checklists, learning curves, and confusion-matrix diagnostics to connect empirical observations with staged adoption recommendations. The best-performing baseline was ResNet50, with 45% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 0.40, showing low technical readiness and substantial motif-specific instability. In contrast, the readiness survey indicated high perceived implementation-side readiness, with an average agreement score of 78.7%. This mismatch reveals a readiness asymmetry: implementation support may exist even when the recognition model remains technically immature. The findings imply that batik-recognition systems should prioritize dataset expansion, expert label validation, model refinement, moderated feedback, security governance, and controlled pilot testing before operational deployment. The framework provides a transparent basis for risk-aware, staged adoption decisions in artificial-intelligence-assisted cultural heritage preservation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
E. Cantemir and O. Kandemir, “Use of artificial neural networks in architecture: determining the architectural style of a building with a convolutional neural networks,” Neural Computing and Applications 2024 36:11, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6195–6207, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S00521-023-09395-Y.
F. A. Mohammed, K. K. Tune, B. G. Assefa, M. Jett, and S. Muhie, “Medical Image Classifications Using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey of Current Methods and Statistical Modeling of the Literature,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 699–735, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/MAKE6010033/S1.
L. Chen, S. Li, Q. Bai, J. Yang, S. Jiang, and Y. Miao, “Review of Image Classification Algorithms Based on Convolutional Neural Networks,” Remote Sensing 2021, Vol. 13, Page 4712, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 4712, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/RS13224712.
W. Hu et al., “A state-of-the-art survey of artificial neural networks for Whole-slide Image analysis: From popular Convolutional Neural Networks to potential visual transformers,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 161, p. 107034, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2023.107034.
E. A. Nabila, C. A. Sari, E. H. Rachmawanto, and M. Doheir, “A Good Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Based on AlexNet in Domestic Indonesian Car Types Classification,” Advance Sustainable Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 0230302, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.26877/ASSET.V5I3.16854.
N. Al Said, D. Gura, and D. Karlov, “Efficiency of Smart AI-Based Voice Apps and Virtual Services Operating With Chatbots,” MENDEL, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 9–16, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.13164/MENDEL.2022.2.009.
K. Jamil, W. Zhang, A. Anwar, and S. Mustafa, “Exploring the Influence of AI Adoption and Technological Readiness on Sustainable Performance in Pakistani Export Sector Manufacturing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises,” Sustainability 2025, Vol. 17, Page 3599, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 3599, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/SU17083599.
H. Felemban, M. Sohail, and K. Ruikar, “Exploring the Readiness of Organisations to Adopt Artificial Intelligence,” Buildings 2024, Vol. 14, Page 2460, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 2460, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS14082460.
J. Jöhnk, M. Weißert, and K. Wyrtki, “Ready or Not, AI Comes— An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors,” Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 5–20, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S12599-020-00676-7/FIGURES/3.
Y. Hu et al., “Artificial Intelligence Security: Threats and Countermeasures,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3487890;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:CSUR;WGROUP:STRING:ACM.
B. Biggio and F. Roli, “Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 84, pp. 317–331, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.PATCOG.2018.07.023.
J. Wang, C. Wang, Q. Lin, C. Luo, C. Wu, and J. Li, “Adversarial attacks and defenses in deep learning for image recognition: A survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 514, pp. 162–181, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2022.09.004.
S. Varshney, S. Singh, C. V. Lakshmi, and C. Patvardhan, “Content-based image retrieval of Indian traditional textile motifs using deep feature fusion,” Scientific Reports 2024 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10035-, May 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56465-9.
M. Mishra and P. B. Lourenço, “Artificial intelligence-assisted visual inspection for cultural heritage: State-of-the-art review,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 66, pp. 536–550, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.CULHER.2024.01.005.
A. L. Carvalho Ottoni and L. T. Cordeiro Ottoni, “A deep learning approach for cultural heritage building classification using transfer learning and data augmentation,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 74, pp. 214–224, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.CULHER.2025.06.010.
J. Zhu and C. Zhu, “Research on the innovative application of Shen Embroidery cultural heritage based on convolutional neural network,” Scientific Reports 2024 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9574-, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60121-7.
M. Xu, S. Yoon, A. Fuentes, and D. S. Park, “A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learning,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 137, p. 109347, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.PATCOG.2023.109347.
T. and S. E. M. Naidu Gireen and Zuva, “A Review of Evaluation Metrics in Machine Learning Algorithms,” in Artificial Intelligence Application in Networks and Systems, P. Silhavy Radek and Silhavy, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 15–25.
D. Chicco and G. Jurman, “The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation,” BMC Genomics 2019 21:1, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 6-, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1186/S12864-019-6413-7.
V. Uren and J. S. Edwards, “Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 68, p. 102588, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2022.102588.
A. N. Tehrani, S. Ray, S. K. Roy, R. L. Gruner, and F. P. Appio, “Decoding AI readiness: An in-depth analysis of key dimensions in multinational corporations,” Technovation, vol. 131, p. 102948, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2023.102948.
M. F. Arroyabe, C. F. A. Arranz, I. Fernandez De Arroyabe, and J. C. Fernandez de Arroyabe, “Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment,” Technol. Soc., vol. 79, p. 102733, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2024.102733.
S. G. Ayinaddis, “Artificial intelligence adoption dynamics and knowledge in SMEs and large firms: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 100682, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100682.
E. Ode, I. F. Awolowo, R. Nana, and F. S. Olawoyin, “Social Capital and Artificial Intelligence Readiness: The Mediating Role of Cyber Resilience and Value Construction of SMEs in Resource-Constrained Environments,” Information Systems Frontiers 2025, pp. 1–21, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/S10796-025-10608-Z.
A. E. Cinà et al., “Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoning,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 13, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3585385;SERIALTOPIC:TOPIC:ACM-PUBTYPE.
M. Rigaki and S. Garcia, “A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learning,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 56, no. 4, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3624010;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:DL-SITE;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:CSUR;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI.
S. Z. El Mestari, G. Lenzini, and H. Demirci, “Preserving data privacy in machine learning systems,” Comput. Secur., vol. 137, p. 103605, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.COSE.2023.103605.
F. A. Yerlikaya and Ş. Bahtiyar, “Data poisoning attacks against machine learning algorithms,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 208, p. 118101, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.ESWA.2022.118101.
A. Paracha, J. Arshad, M. B. Farah, and K. Ismail, “Machine learning security and privacy: a review of threats and countermeasures,” EURASIP Journal on Information Security 2024 2024:1, vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 10-, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1186/S13635-024-00158-3.
E. Mosqueira-Rey, E. Hernández-Pereira, D. Alonso-Ríos, J. Bobes-Bascarán, and Á. Fernández-Leal, “Human-in-the-loop machine learning: a state of the art,” Artificial Intelligence Review 2022 56:4, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 3005–3054, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10462-022-10246-W.
J. Meyer et al., “Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 100199, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2023.100199.
M. Glickman and T. Sharot, “How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements,” Nature Human Behaviour 2024 9:2, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 345–359, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2.
M. A. Rasyidi and T. Bariyah, "Batik pattern recognition using convolutional neural network," Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1430–1437, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.11591/eei.v9i4.2385.
D. G. Meranggi, N. Yudistira, and Y. A. Sari, "Batik Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network with Data Improvements," JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 6–11, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.30630/joiv.6.1.716.
M. A. Rasyidi, R. Handayani, and F. Aziz, "Identification of batik making method from images using convolutional neural network with limited amount of data," Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1300–1307, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.11591/eei.v10i3.3035.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i3.1427
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
| ISSN | : | 2723-6471 (Online) |
| Publisher | : | Bright Publisher |
| Website | : | http://bright-journal.org/JADS |
| : | taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact) | |
| support@bright-journal.org (technical issues) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0