Newton Divided Difference Optimization for Fingerprint-Based Neural Virtual Screening against Avian Influenza A/H9N2

Siti Amiroch, Mohammad Jamhuri, Awawin Mustana Rohmah, Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, Chairul Anwar Nidom, Reviany Vibrianita Nidom

Abstract


Avian influenza A/H9N2 poses persistent zoonotic and veterinary threats, yet efficient computational tools for antiviral compound prioritization remain underdeveloped, particularly with respect to optimizer behavior in high-dimensional neural screening. This study proposes Newton Divided Difference (NDD) optimization, a lightweight positive diagonal curvature-aware training strategy, as a novel optimizer for fingerprint-based neural virtual screening against avian influenza A/H9N2, with the objective of evaluating its performance across aligned molecular fingerprint representations and chemically structured validation protocols. An aligned benchmark of 1,459 molecules consisting of 615 candidate active compounds and 844 decoys was represented by EState (79 features), PubChem (881 features), and Klekota–Roth (4,860 features) fingerprints, sharing identical molecule identities, labels, and split assignments. A fixed multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier was trained with NDD and seven baseline optimizers under stratified, scaffold-key, and similarity-cluster split protocols across five repeated seeds. NDD achieved the highest descriptive ROC-AUC (Receiver Operating Characteriztic – Area Under the Curve) and PR-AUC (Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve) on Klekota–Roth fingerprints under scaffold-key and similarity-cluster protocols, and remained competitive under the stratified split with ROC-AUC of 0.9872. Architecture-sensitivity tests confirmed stable NDD performance across multiple network configurations, with ROC-AUC values ranging from 0.9876 to 0.9890. Compared with Hessian-free optimization, NDD reduced per-run runtime from approximately 50–54 seconds to approximately 8 seconds on Klekota–Roth under the same CPU-only configuration while achieving comparable ranking performance. The novelty of this work lies in the first systematic assessment of NDD for H9N2 neural virtual screening, demonstrating that positive diagonal curvature-aware scaling provides a practical, stable, and computationally efficient optimization alternative in sparse high-dimensional ligand-based screening settings, although external validation and prospective experimental confirmation remain necessary before practical antiviral prioritization.


Keywords


H9N2 Influenza; Virtual Screening; Molecular Fingerprints; Divided Difference; Curvature-Aware Optimization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wenjun Song and Kun Qin. “Human-infecting influenza A (H9N2) virus: A forgotten potential pandemic strain?” In: Zoonoses and Public Health 67.3 (2020), pp. 203–212. doi:10.1111/zph.12685.

Thomas P. Peacock, Joe James, Joshua E. Sealy, and Munir Iqbal. “A global perspective on H9N2 avian influenza virus”. In: Viruses 11.7 (2019), p. 620. doi: 10.3390/v11070620.

Andesfha E. Muflihanah et al. “Kasus Pertama Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Subtipe H9N2 pada Peternakan Ayam Petelur di Kabupaten Sidrap, Sulawesi Selatan Indonesia”. In: Diagnosa Veteriner 16.1 (2017), pp. 1–13. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/items/f0b89130-8ab1-400a-81f7-4825702fdd9d.

Francesco Bonfante et al. “A G1-lineage H9N2 virus with oviduct tropism causes chronic pathological changes in the infundibulum and a long-lasting drop in egg production”. In:Veterinary Research 49 (2018), p. 83. doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0575-1.

Setyarina Indrasari et al. “The First Pathogenicity Analysis Report in Mice with Two H9N2 Subtype Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Indonesia”. In: Biochemical and Cellular Archives 21.1 (2021), pp. 593–598. https://scholar.unair.ac.id/en/publications/the-first-pathogenicity-analysis-report-in-mice-with-two-h9n2-sub/.

Maria Kontoyianni. “Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery”. In: Proteomics for Drug Discovery: Methods and Protocols. Vol. 1647. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, 2017, pp. 255–266. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7201-2_18.

Sheisi F. L. da Silva Rocha, Carolina G. Olanda, Harold H. Fokoue, and Carlos M. R. Sant’Anna. “Virtual Screening Techniques in Drug Discovery: Review and Recent Applications”. In: Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 19.19 (2019), pp. 1751–1767. doi: 10.2174/1568026619666190816101948.

Judith M. Rollinger, Hermann Stuppner, and Thierry Langer. “Virtual Screening for the Discovery of Bioactive Natural Products”. In: Progress in Drug Research. Vol. 65. Birkhäuser Basel, 2008, pp. 213–249. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8117-2_6.

Anastasiia V. Sadybekov and Vsevolod Katritch. “Computational approaches streamlining drug discovery”. In: Nature 616.7958 (2023), pp. 673–685. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05905-z.

Tiago Alves de Oliveira, Michel Pires da Silva, Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia, Alisson Marques da Silva, and Alex Gutterres Taranto. “Virtual Screening Algorithms in Drug Discovery: A Review Focused on Machine and Deep Learning Methods”. In: Drugs and Drug Candidates 2.2 (2023), pp. 311–334. doi: 10.3390/ddc2020017.

Said Moshawih, Zhen Hui Bu, Hui Poh Goh, Nurolaini Kifli, Lam Hong Lee, Khang Wen Goh, and Long Chiau Ming. “Consensus holistic virtual screening for drug discovery: a novel machine learning model approach”. In: Journal of Cheminformatics 16 (2024), p. 62. doi: 10.1186/s13321-024-00855-8.

Kristy A. Carpenter and Xudong Huang. “Machine Learning-Based Virtual Screening and Its Applications to Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery: A Review”. In: Current Pharmaceutical Design 24.28 (2018), pp. 3347–3358. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180607124038.

Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Deepak Singla, Alok K. Mondal, and Gajendra P. S. Raghava. “DrugMint: a webserver for predicting and designing of drug-like molecules”. In: Biology Direct 8 (2013), p. 28. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-28.

Paula Carracedo-Reboredo, Jose Liñares-Blanco, Nereida Rodríguez-Fernández, Francisco Cedrón, Francisco J. Novoa, Adrian Carballal, Victor Maojo, Alejandro Pazos, and Carlos Fernandez-Lozano. “A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery”.

In: Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19 (2021), pp. 4538–4558. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011.

Si Zheng et al. “Machine learning-enabled virtual screening indicates the anti-tuberculosis activity of aldoxorubicin and quarfloxin with verification by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and biological evaluations”. In: Briefings in Bioinformatics 26.1

(2025), bbae696. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae696.

Siti Amiroch, Mohammad Isa Irawan, Imam Mukhlash, Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, and Chairul Anwar Nidom. “Machine Learning for the Prediction of Antiviral Compounds Targeting Avian Influenza A/H9N2 Viral Proteins”. In: Symmetry 14.6 (2022), p. 1114. doi: 10.3390/sym14061114.

Siti Amiroch, Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, Mohammad Isa Irawan, Imam Mukhlash, and A. Chairul Nidom. “Analysis of Protein-Protein Interaction to Obtain Significant Protein in Influenza Virus Type A/H9N2”. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2498. AIP Publishing, 2022, p. 020021. doi: 10.1063/5.0083336.

Siti Amiroch, Mohammad Jamhuri, Mohammad Isa Irawan, Imam Mukhlash, and Chairul Anwar Nidom. “Predicting Antiviral Compounds for Avian Influenza A/H9N2 Using Logistic Regression with RBF Kernel”. In: 2023 International Conference on Modeling & E-Information Research, Artificial Learning and Digital Applications (ICMERALDA).

IEEE, 2023, pp. 68–73. doi: 10.1109/ICMERALDA60125.2023.10458186.

Siti Amiroch, Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, and Mohammad Dzulfikar Fauzi. “Target Baru Pengobatan Meningitis berdasarkan Centrality Measure Jaringan Protein dan Self Organizing Map”. In: Limits: Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications 21.3

(2024), pp. 397–416. doi: 10.12962/limits.v21i3.21776.

Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, Siti Amiroch, Bernadus Anggo Seno Aji, and Avriono Aritonang. “Classification of IGF1R ligand compounds for identification of herbal extracts using extreme gradient boosting”. In: Jurnal Informatika 16.3 (2022), pp. 139–150. doi:

26555/jifo.v16i3.a23286.

Riska Aprilia, Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby, Muhammad Adib Kamali, and Muhammad Dzulfikar Fauzi. “Herb Compounds Screening as Meningitis Inhibitor Candidates Using Neural Network and Random Forest Methods”. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 3250. 1. 2025, p. 020005. doi: 10.1063/5.0240568.

Mohammad Hamim Zajuli Al Faroby and Muhammad Dzulfikar Fauzi. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Identifikasi Protein Kunci pada Kanker Darah: Integrasi MCDM, KMeans, dan Topologi Jaringan”. In: Reputasi: Jurnal Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak 6.1 (2025), pp. 7–

doi: 10.31294/reputasi.v6i1.8959.

Lowell H. Hall and Lemont B. Kier. “The electrotopological state: an atom index for QSAR”. In: Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 35.6 (1995), pp. 1039–1045. doi: 10.1021/ci00028a014.

Sunghwan Kim et al. “PubChem substance and compound databases”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 44.D1 (2016), pp. D1202–D1213. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv951.

Jan Klekota and Frederick P. Roth. “Chemical substructures that enrich for biological activity”. In: Bioinformatics 24.21 (2008), pp. 2518–2525. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn479.

Chun Wei Yap. “PaDEL-Descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints”. In: Journal of Computational Chemistry 32.7 (2011), pp. 1466–1474. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21707.

C. G. Broyden. “A Class of Methods for Solving Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations”. In: Mathematics of Computation 19.92 (1965), pp. 577–593. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6.

J. E. Dennis and J. J. Moré. “Quasi-Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory”. In: SIAM Review 19.1 (1977), pp. 46–89. doi: 10.1137/1019005.

Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright. Numerical Optimization. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5.

Mohammad Jamhuri, Silvi Puspita Sari, Siti Amiroch, Juhari, and Vivi Aida Fitria. “Inexact Generalized Gauss–Newton–CG for Binary Cross-Entropy Minimization”. In: Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Matematika 5.2 (2025), pp. 102–122. doi: 10.18860/jrmm.v5i2.34739.

Ruslan Abdulkadirov, Pavel Lyakhov, and Nikolay Nagornov. “Survey of Optimization Algorithms in Modern Neural Networks”. In: Mathematics 11.11 (2023), p. 2466. doi: 10.3390/math11112466.

Mikalai Korbit, Adeyemi D. Adeoye, Alberto Bemporad, and Mario Zanon. “Exact Gauss-Newton optimization for training deep neural networks”. In: Neurocomputing (2025), p. 131738. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131738.

Michael M. Mysinger, Michael Carchia, John J. Irwin, and Brian K. Shoichet. “Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking”. In: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 55.14 (2012), pp. 6582–6594. doi: 10.1021/jm300687e.

Qianrong Guo, Saiveth Hernandez-Hernandez, and Pedro J. Ballester. “Scaffold Splits Overestimate Virtual Screening Performance”. In: Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2024, pp. 58–72. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72359-9_5.

Qianrong Guo, Saiveth Hernandez-Hernandez, and Pedro J. Ballester. “UMAP-based clustering split for rigorous evaluation of AI models for virtual screening on cancer cell lines”. In: Journal of Cheminformatics 17 (2025). doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-01039-8.

Larry Armijo. “Minimization of Functions Having Lipschitz Continuous First Partial Derivatives”. In: Pacific Journal of Mathematics 16.1 (1966), pp. 1–3. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1966.16.1.

Eve Richardson, Raphael Trevizani, Jason A. Greenbaum, Hannah Carter, Morten Nielsen, and Bjoern Peters. “The receiver operating characteristic curve accurately assesses imbalanced datasets”. In: Patterns 5.6 (2024), p. 100994. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100994.

Matthew B. A. McDermott, Haoran Zhang, Lasse Hyldig Hansen, Giovanni Angelotti, and Jack Gallifant. “A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalance”. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37. 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.06091.

Diana Nurjanah, Fadilah Fadilah, and Ni Luh Putu Indi Dharmayanti. “Virtual Screening of Indonesian Herbal Compounds with Neuraminidase Inhibitor Activity against N2 Influenza Virus Protein: An in silico Study”. In: Molecular and Cellular Biomedical Sciences 8.2 (2024). doi: 10.21705/mcbs.v8i2.468.

Rosaria Gitto, Lisa Lombardo, Angela Ravenda, Francesco Broccolo, Antonio Mastino, Laura De Luca, and Francesca Marino-Merlo. “Discovery of Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitors: Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Biological Evaluation of Novel Chemotypes”. In: Molecules 30.23 (2025), p. 4636. doi: 10.3390/molecules30234636.

Jing Li et al. “SMCseeker: An attentive virtual screening model for antiviral discovery”. In: iScience 28.9 (2025), p. 113452. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113452.

Ittipat Meewan, Nalini Schaduangrat, Lawankorn Mookdarsanit, Pakpoom Mookdarsanit, and Watshara Shoombuatong. “Explainable AI-driven prediction of influenza neuraminidase inhibitors using a stacked ensemble-learning framework”. In: Computers in Biology and Medicine 199 (2025), p. 111313. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111313.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i3.1416

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN : 2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher : Bright Publisher
Website : http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email : taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
    support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0